Saturday, December 24, 2016

Obama's Birth Certificate is a Forged Document !





JUST THINK, THIS IS ONLY A FEW DAYS AGO!
LETS SEE HAPPENS NEXT?

Published on Dec 16, 2016
The evidence is conclusive. Barack Obama's birth certificate is a forged document. Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse holds an urgent press conference revealing forensic evidence that proves once and for all that Donald Trump was right about Obama's birth certificate. The document is a fraud. Share this video with those who refuse to accept the undeniable evidence that Barack Obama is a Ghost President.

One thing they don’t talk about in the video is if Obama is not a natural citizen both elections will be NULL and  VOID.  And more importantly everything he has signed into law would also be NULL and VOID.

 We should all send this to our congressmen in both branches.

WATCH THE TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE

http://www.infowars.com/sheriff-arpaio-proves-obama-birth-certificate-forged/


Of the three likely scenarios which one do you think will happen?

1.    Sheriff Joe Arpaio'se case will go forward before Obama's term is up.

2.   After January 20th the case will go forward

3.  Nothing will happen.



Thursday, December 22, 2016

SOCIAL SECURITY ---THE BIG LIE! AND THE SOLUTION







SOCIAL SECURITY ---THE BIG LIE! AND THE SOLUTION
By A Political Junky

We are constantly battered with the idea that we must SAVE Social Security. We are left with the impression that this Evil Scam is some sort of a great social program, is it?     ABSOLUTELY NOT!
Let’s run some numbers and see. If an 18-old person earning $7.50 per hour was allowed to put his or her weekly Social Security contribution into a private mortgage investment that paid 10% interest per year. And if that individual never got a raise but continued to work at $7.50 for the next 10 years putting only his weekly contribution into this same fund. And at the end of those 10 years (age 28) they never put one more penny into this fund, but left it to collect the same 10% interest until age 65. At that time, he or she would have $1,425,480 in the fund. This would provide the individual, should they choose to retire at this time an annual benefit of $142,548 per year, or $2,741 per week, or $390.54 per day, 7 DAYS A WEEK.   I certainly would have no trouble getting by on $142,548 per year, how about you?  Also, when this person dies there will still be $1,425,480 IN THE FUND to leave to his or her children. If this person gets married and their spouse has also worked for the same amount of time at the same pay rate also putting their Social Security contributions into the same fund, at retirement age 65, this couple has in their combined fund  $2,850,960 which they could leave to their children.

 Let’s suppose our couple had three children, and to simplify the math, they were all triplets born when our pair was 47 years old. Let’s also suppose mom and dad died in a car wreck two weeks after the trio had their 18th birthday. Those children would receive as the heirs a weekly check of $1,828 each. Gosh, that means they wouldn’t have to work at all for their whole life. If these same children, then contributed the same percentage of their weekly inheritance check that their parents did to the same trust retirement fund. At age 65 after living their whole life not even having to work at all, they would EACH receive retirement benefits of $48,088 PER DAY!!!

WHY DO WE WANT TO SAVE THIS CURRENT PONZI SYSTEM when after only one generation everyone in the trust fund system WOULD BE INDEPENDENTLY WEALTHY?

Now let’s look at the great SOCIAL SECURITY system. This System has consistently raised contribution rates and consistently cut benefits, and based on their historical trend we can expect our payments to the Social Security Administration will continue to go up and the benefits they pay will go down. Why save this PONZI SCHEME even if they don’t raise rates or cut benefits? What would they get from Social Security now with the same payments as in the example above? Based on their own work sheets Social Security would in 2016 pay all retired workers about $1,295/month, or $15,540/year.
And the death benefits would be ZERO. Why save this evil program? If anyone, or any company, in the private sector did such a terrible job of mismanaging their client’s funds, they will be thrown in jail immediately. Now is the time to get these incompetent bundlers out of our lives. Let us control our own destiny.

 As for the soundness of the two plans, let’s look at the record. I would invest the contributing funds in real estate mortgages. I don’t think there is a sounder investment. The government has always invested in itself, an organization that is trillions of dollars in debt. If the federal government went to a bank for a loan, they would be turned down if they were judged by the same standard as the rest of us. They have continued to invest in failed programs and are further in debt than in any time in history. It’s just a matter of time until they go bankrupt in fact they are technically bankrupt now. When the chickens come home to roost, they will not have any money left to give. Our private plan will still be paying at the rates listed above and the investors in our fund will own the property they invested in by default. What do you prefer? The empty promises of proven liars and money miss managers or the security of a sound real estate investment?

 I don’t see any way to disprove the value of Our Proposed System nor can there be any valid excuses made to protect the worthless SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM. As to the humanitarian benefits of our system, the money generated by the contributions could be used to make loans to those who can’t readily get them. For example, if 10 young men pool their funds at the end of one year they can finance a grocery store building in their own neighborhood, to serve their own people. The only one to suffer, the banks and big government, neither of which are doing a very good job, to promote the general welfare of WE THE PEOPLE at this time. The individual benefit of self-esteem would be an adequate reward by itself, never mind the fact that after one generation of this plan there would be no more poverty in any neighborhood where the workers had jobs that paid as little as $7.50 per hour.
I stand for no political party; I stand only for The American Dream and that dream has nothing to do with the mere accumulation of wealth even though our plan provides it.  I stand for:  LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.  THAT IS THE AMERICAN DREAM!

 Let no one tell you otherwise. This country was created to preserve these precepts. If you don’t like what this country is all about take your communistic welfare state ideas and leave it to those that value LIBERTY above all things. And you in your position of power, if you insist on deceiving the masses to work toward your evil goals and they are foolish enough to follow your empty dreams, go all of you in peace. May your chains of servitude rest lightly on your shoulders, be content with the gifts your slave masters give to you and you slave masters be happy with the lifeblood you can drain from your slaves, but leave me to live my life as a free man.

THE SOLUTION TO SOCIAL SECURITY

A gradual transition would be the best way to approach the problem.
1.        Any worker over 55 could stay in the current system from now on if they want to. If they want to start transitioning, it is their choice.
2.        Start slowly with everybody under age 55. Take a certain percentage of their social security contribution like 10% and put it in their selected financial private fund, such as real estate funds.

3,        Every year another 10% would be added to their contribution. So after 10 years 100% of their contribution goes into their private   fund.

4.        In 10 years they would be completely transferred from social security to their private fund.   And what they have accumulated during their working years to Social Security prior to the transfer would be paid out when they turned 65 as it is now.

5.        They would have accumulated in their own fund 10 years of contribution, Plus the interest at 10% per year during the 10 years.

6.        If they continue to work past age 65, all contributions would go into their private fund.


7.        After age 65, If they would like to contribute to their private fund, any amount would be acceptable during any current year.

8.        Anytime  after age 65, if they want to withdraw whatever amount from their private fund, it is their choice. It could be for medical expenses, for grandkids, or for vacations.

If we search the Internet in 2016 we will find the average income per household is $51,900 and the average contributions to social security it Is about 15.3%. Multiplying these numbers we get $7800 which will be the yearly contribution to Social Security. If we start the private fund with 10% social security payment in January of the year, the first year we have $780 +10% interest equals $850 in the fund the first year. The second year we contribute 20% or $1,560 plus $850 left over from the first year Plus adding 10% we will have $2660 in the private fund. Continuing this program for 10 years we will have $64,623 in the private fund.
What starts to get interesting if we continue funding the private fund in year 11 with 100% of our social security payment of $7,800 plus 10% interest on that and the $64,623  already in the fund. We wind up with $79,666 in the fund at the end of year 11. The value of the fund goes up an average of about $18,000 each year, but it increases $2000+ each year so that at the end of year 15 we have $156,461 in the person’s private fund.

We have now shown how to solve the Social Security problem. It will take 10 years for the total transition. However, those 55 or older would be paid their normal Social Security depending on their contributions for the rest of their lives. Or, if they decided to start contributing to their private fund at 55 or even after, they would have money available for any purpose.


Friday, November 25, 2016

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

From The Week Magazine, November 25,





From The Week Magazine, November 25, 2016 issue

A summation of John Podhoretz’s article “ Obama’s costly overreach–to the Democrats.
Barack Obama will leave the democratic party in shambles. He was a political genius in getting himself elected, but for his party he’s been an unmitigated disaster.

 Since January 20, 2009 more than 1,110 Democratic Federal and State elected officials have lost their jobs to Republicans. Democrats controlled 62 of the 99 legislative chambers in 2009. Republicans now controlled 68. Democrats controlled 31 Governors and now hold just 17.  He saw his election as an endorsement of a highly progressive agenda, which he forced through “too much, too fast, two soon” which include Obamacare, massive bailouts and stimulus spending, new taxes, and the heavy business regulation(s).  Democrats will weep when Obama leaves office, but the truth is there hero  presided over “the collapse of the Democratic Party”.         
                                                ___________________________________

                                    These things happen during Obama’s tenure
                                              The Wall Street Journal
 More people in their 40s and older are moving in with their aging parents for financial reasons. In California adults ages 50 to 65 living with their parents rose 68% between 2006 and 2012, and data across the nation shows a similar trend. How sad.
                           ____________________________________

                                                 From the U. S. Elections Project
About 100 million eligible voters did not cast a ballot in this year’s presidential election. About 132 million did vote – by percentage, the lowest turnout since 1996.

Maybe this is a good thing, when you consider 97% of the people don’t know what’s going on, don’t know who the candidates are, especially the local ones – so if you know what’s going on, the question to ask "yourself is why should the people who don’t know what’s going on, why should they vote?"

Monday, November 21, 2016

Beware of These 20 Fake News Sites


We subscribe to a publication called  Laissez Faire.  We received and email talking about "Fake News Sites". Below is a summary of the main points of the article. Once you review the list of Fake News Sites you will now know the ones NOT to watch.



America is waking up to the fact that the mainstream press does little more than parrot what they’re told. (I have said for a long time the mainstream media doesn't tell you the news, they tell you what the administration wants you to believe) It’s no secret that the mainstream media is now a monolith of just six colluding corporations which serve their corporate/government masters first, with truth as a mere afterthought.


 Below is the full list of the top-20 (yes, twenty!) fake news websites in just one moment. This list might not be what you expect. (Or, heck, it might be exactly what you’re expecting.)




Whatever you do, be very wary of what these fake news sites publish. They’ve been caught red-handed violating the (albeit flawed) sacred Journalist's Creed, set in ink by the (very) late Walter Williams over a century ago.

Here they are…
Google “[name] WikiLeaks” for the leaks
Stay vigilant,
Chris Campbell
Managing editor, Laissez Faire Today